Sustainability–More than a Buzz Word

Late 2009 and early 2010 I read several books and many articles on Business as Mission (BAM). I had discovered this field through the Perspectives on the World Christian Movement course. As I worked through these I kept encountering an aversion to missions organizations and missionaries. I actually found it quite puzzling and at times frustrating.

Earlier today I re-read an email I sent to a friend that has given me cause for pause. Maybe this is part of why BAMers are apprehensive of traditional missions practices.

Let me share part of the email I mentioned:

*******************************************************************

Some good things will come from me being here. They already have some agriculture projects going on that can dovetail nicely into some things I have been thinking about. The brother who oversees those projects, went through David Watson’s level 1 training. He already has some early successes of using drip irrigation and compost training as access ministries into nearby villages.

When I told him about the treadle foot pumps and mentioned that some people use them to water tree seedlings that they sell as a cash crop he got excited. He took me outside and showed me rows of tree seedlings that are growing in small black plastic bags filled with compost. He told me they sprout under the fruit trees during the rainy season, but will die during the dry season. He paid three cents each for the bags, composted the soil and then transplanted the seedlings. These will be watered through the dry season and then can be sold to local people at the start of the next rainy season. If planted at the start, they will develop the root system to survive the next dry season.

He has started these seedlings because he takes a few along to the irrigation/compost trainings he does in rural villages. He shows them the trees so they see the value of the compost in developing a cash crop. He said, “I know they could care for so many more seedlings with one of those pumps.”
 
My challenge is getting this brother to not just see these projects as great means to gain access to villages, but as ways to help their Access Ministry division to become self-funded. Missions people are so fund-raising focused that they don’t seem to see a business opportunity that bites them in the behind.

They have a well and water towers here so they do not need the foot pumps, but he sees how valuable they could be in the villages. But his first thoughts are on raising U.S. money to give pumps to these groups.

Sustainability seems to be a word everyone knows, but is blinded to seeing the obvious way forward. They have lots of men working here on building projects, carrying supplies, and even sweeping the driveways. But the funding for these jobs is all being paid for by American donors. Right now they have big projects on hold because of the lack of funding due to the American recession.
 
It is good for me to have to wrestle with this within myself because these are the kinds of issues we will face all over Africa—especially where we have people who are already receiving support. This brother showed me a row of fruit trees loaded with produce and when I asked he said they would bring $1.00 a piece in roadside markets and $2.00-3.00 apiece in the local super markets.

Why aren’t they growing groves of this fruit on their open land and selling them to fund the purchase of drip kits, foot pumps, etc.? I will probably ask these questions before I leave, but want to earn more of their respect/trust and make sure I do not raise them with the edge I feel right now. I know they fear getting absorbed in the business of business, but instead they are absorbed in the business of fund-raising.

I know that such projects will take some money on the front end, time, and lots of hard work. But they have an incredible cash crop and so many unemployed people around. One of these nurseries could support a CPM trainer. A grove of these trees could support a CPM trainer. But you have to train a faith community to see that their work can further the spread of the gospel and improve their lives too.

*******************************************************************

Business people don’t trust missions because they never get enough donations. Missions people don’t trust business people because all their focus is on business. Does it have to be this way?

Truly sustainable missions practices will have to produce income. They may start more easily with adequate capital on the front end, but they have to reach the point that they pay for their own upkeep and expansions. We can learn more of this from business people. But we must not lose sight of the fact that when our goal for these businesses is to further the spread of the kingdom, then we will probably have a different outlook than many business people.

God has ordained both fields. God calls some to business. God calls some to missions. I truly believe there are people he calls to both–simultaneously (think about Paul’s words to the Ephesian elders in Acts 20). Can we not marry the best of both worlds? Can we not use BAM to further CPM? Can we not begin access ministries that grow into Christian Community Development? These are places to teach for the increase of knowledge, coach to pass on new/improved skills and mentor to increase capacity.

get into the water to learn to swim

When I recently taught and coached CPM principles and approaches in Africa, I had a student from Malawi. He was attending a Bible college in neighboring Zambia and became very engaged in the class. I knew he was on board when we chatted during one of the breaks. He told me about a study group that he had started near the college.

Early on he had success with the head of the household through personal evangelism. But lately the man had been absent and was clearly avoiding my student. He wondered out loud  if the situation would be different had he used a household evangelistic approach. He was not approaching my classes as an abstract exercise, but was thinking experientially.

So much Western education works counter to this happening because it is a slow tedious knowledge-based process that runs counter to the hands-on learning demanded by discipleship. The more highly educated in Western traditional practices the individual is, CPM strategies generally prove to be little more than mind-game diversions. Unless one has already become highly frustrated/disappointed with traditional practices and has actively begun the search for new ways, the less likely he/she is to attempt CPM approaches.  To become open to experience-based learning, one must acknowledge that the old paradigms will not get the job done and begin applying CPM strategies to real-life situations.

Interestingly, though, it is best if this dissatisfaction arises from within the person being discipled without being forced by the trainer. When the motivation to change is primarily external, there is an internal frustration that hinders transformation because this person is not yet equipped to counter the opposition that will naturally arise to changing.

Just as you do not learn to swim without getting into the water, people will not learn to disciple in CPM ways without attempting them. Implimenting CPM strategies in North American contexts will demand we identify people who are working in settings that are very difficult or it is highly unlikely they will make the effort to experientially learn new ways. As long as people assume they can do traditional things better, more, and/or smarter they will refuse to invest the effort change demands. For example, when people have been called by God to reach an immigrant community that is close-knit and using their native religion as a way to maintain their sense of identity, traditional practices will not work. Only a total novice will assume that doing traditional things better will result in a breakthrough.

Like my student in Zambia, these workers are more likely to consider CPM approaches. But they will have to begin using them personally before they are likely to train someone else. (When I shared how to do a 3-column study with my dentist, he replied matter-of-factly, “That’s not how I study the Bible.” While he acknowledged that his personal practice of opening half a dozen commentaries, a Bible dictionary and a concordance was not feasible for men in jail, he refused to consider the possibility that maybe he needed to learn a simple, reproducible approach that he could share with them.)

You must do it before you will train someone else. You may teach information you do not practice daily, but most people will not coach skills that they do not personally utilize. Since CPM is fundamentally about hearing Scripture, preparing to re-tell what you are hearing and identifying what you need to do to obey the passage, you must do these things personally to coach someone else in doing them. You have to get into the water to learn to swim.

Side-by-side Comparisons

I have a friend who works in the “home-flipping” market. You know, buy cheap, re-hab the neglected home and then sell it at a profit. While some people do not like this industry, it can really help folks who are in desparate financial situations.

He and I were talking today at lunch about my recent trip to Africa. When I told him about the time I spent with a guy who is focusing on training small-plot farmers to use appropriate technology, he chuckled and quoted some speakers who periodically make presentations to the regional “flipping” group: “These principles will work in every city of the nation, except yours!”

That quote was used to point out our human tendency to rationalize our unwillingness to change. Most human beings will find reasons why the successes that come in other places cannot be duplicated where we live. We are often our own biggest obstacle to healthy change.

Why won’t they change? Why won’t we change? Those two questions came to my mind as I discussed the situation with my friend.

One of the techniques my new friend in Africa uses is side-by-side comparisons. He has trained people to do “no-till” farming of maize (corn)–the grain staple in the country where he lives. Rather than trying to get the small-plot farmers to convert all of their land to no-till, he gets them to agree to plant half of it no-till and the other half using their traditional method. The beauty of this methodology is the people get to see exactly how much the change helps. One half of their land produces the usual amount. What will they think when the other side produces 4-5 times as much? They cannot attribute the difference to the luck of a better year. These two sections received the same rainfall. The difference is the preparation of the small planting holes that were prepared during the dry season, just prior to the rainy season. A small amount of manure is worked into these holes and the micro-organisms of the surrounding areas are not disturbed. The ground holds its moisture better because it has not been tilled. Here the farmers are allowed to discover for themselves the reality that healthy changes can be fruitful.

I am excited about using such agricultural practices as access ministries because they model kingdom living. Think about how many of Jesus’ parables were based on agriculture. There is great benefit to learning from God’s design for our world to be fruitful and multiply. We learn patience. We are reminded of mystery. But we also learn the incredible role of the wise gardener–the importance of the vinedresser.

What might happen in sub-Saharan Africa if church planters train people in the best of small-plot farming? What kinds of transformation might come as emerging churches begin to use appropriate technology and are thus able to support sending church planting trainers out to nearby villages and regions. What might happen if sustainability became more than a buzz word thrown out at missions conferences and fund raising events.

Maybe I am just a dreamer. Maybe, just maybe, though, there is a way we can catalyze significant changes. The God of Scripture cares about the whole of life. Shalom involves wholeness.

I am excited about what the future may hold. I am excited that I get to spend time with people who don’t discount the concept that real change is possible. A wise friend has reminded me through the years, “If you keep doing what you’ve always done, you will always get what you have always gotten.” Maybe there are people who are waking up to the possibility of changing some of what we are doing to healthier, more fruitful practices in hopes of getting better results!

We already know the results of traditional practices. Maybe some side-by-side comparisons will help us all.

Could CPM be Taught in Seminaries?

In a recent round-table digital discussion of efforts to develop Strategy Coordinators for CPM, one of the participants raised the suggestion of getting CPM training into seminaries. He hopes we can get people to consider ways to plant the gospel into clusters rather than personal and mass evangelistic practices that often prove extractional.

This suggestion caught my attention because I am currently teaching for two weeks in a small Bible college/seminary in south-central Africa. It turns out that the President of this Bible College is a long-time friend. After he and some of the senior staff attended one of David Watson’s level 1 trainings in Livingstone, Zambia a couple of years ago, we had a lengthy conversation on CPM. (I also spent half a day introducing his brother—who had been my roommate in Bible College for two years—to CPM. This brother is a major donor to this school.) Because of their interest in CPM, this leadership team reached out to Shodankeh Johnson to see if there was someone from his team who could be sent here to assist with implementing CPM in the school’s training program.

The whole program here is in a state of flux (I believe it has strong potential to move in some excellent directions). It is a Church of Christ affiliated school in a nation with some very legalistic churches in our fellowship, so there are some potential pitfalls, but there are also some wonderful opportunities. I am being given total freedom to teach whatever I want and was encouraged to do some CPM training. I have spent this first week training 35 second semester students to do 3-column Bible studies and oral Discovery Bible Studies. The timing of me being here at this point in the school year is truly a God-thing.

One of the new emphases the school is addressing is the need for spiritual formation of the students. A second group of 35 students, who just arrived on campus this week, are starting a first semester that focuses exclusively on developing their spiritual character. They will be paired with older students who are to serve as spiritual mentors. These older students are being mentored by faculty and staff. They began in January and are my immediate students. Because of this arrangement when I assign my students with the responsibility of teaching someone else what they are learning, they have these newer students to teach, coach and/or mentor.

My students are quickly gaining a deeper appreciation of the Discovery Bible Studies. I taught them how to do a 3-column study on Monday and then gave them homework where they had to do a passage. They turned those in on Tuesday and we went over more of the process and introduced doing it in an oral format. They gained new insights into familiar passages by this approach  so they realize this can be beneficial for them—not just lost people. I gave them more homework to prepare for doing a study tomorrow in a totally oral format. I am hoping to build their confidence in the methodology over the two weeks.

Having such a readily available opportunity to pass on what they are learning is a real blessing. As we all know, you must actually train someone else quickly in what you have been learning, or you don’t get the experiential learning. The new group of students, who arrived on Sunday to start their Spiritual Formation semester, is motivated because their future here is tied to character development. Those who grow spiritually will be invited back for further study, but they are not automatically guaranteed a slot.

On Wednesday I followed up on the assignment of sharing what they were learning.  Out of 35 there were only three who had done the assignment. I was so shocked, because they had done everything else I had asked. I expressed my disappointment and then stated that maybe I was not doing too well as a teacher if they were not willing to share what they were learning. The class leader apologized for them and asked for more time to complete the assignment. On Thursday almost every hand went up when I asked who had shared with a new student. I asked how it had gone and they were pleased. They said there were some good questions raised by the new students.

Also, I had them write a prayer for believers in their nation based on Paul’s prayer at the end of Ephesians 3. I had four of the students to stand and read their prayers. They were excellent! Everyone gave me a copy of their prayers and kept the original. For homework for Friday their assignment was to re-write the same prayer, but personalize one copy for the new student that they spoke with on Wednesday. They were to get with that student, pray the prayer for him/her and then give them the written copy. Also they were to re-write the prayer and personalize it for the staff member who is serving as their spiritual mentor and give him/her that copy and tell them, “I am praying this prayer for you.”

When I dismissed the class I failed to pray for them, as had become my pattern. The oldest of the students came quickly to me and said, “Pray for us as you have the other days!” I called the class back to order and prayed a prayer of praise for their hearts and their work. I lifted the stack of prayers up and asked God to multiply them many times over for the sake of their nation and the surrounding ones. It may have been the most special prayer of my life! My heart was overflowing. They made me so proud!

On Friday they were very happy to share about their interactions with the newer students. I also met with the staff mentors and a few of the students that have been selected to be spiritual mentors with the newer students. I asked the staff mentors if they had received anything on Thursday afternoon. They were beaming. One said, “I am going to paper the wall of my apartment with those prayers!”

In addition to my time with the students, I have been able to participate in a couple of the staff meetings and it has given me opportunities to reinforce some of the things Bro. Sandi Mustapha (the believer from Sierra Leone that I trained to do DBSs in 2005) has already been introducing. The meeting was focused on how the spiritual mentoring is going and I will be doing some training of those mentors who are being selected to work with these new students. I am getting to work with every level of the staff, faculty and student body (either directly or indirectly). It is pretty incredible how much the president has pulled me in even though there is much about CPM that he still does not fully appreciate, yet. But that is not totally surprising since he brought Bro. Sandi here.

I have also had some great conversations with the man who works with their agriculture/Access Ministry area. He is the first person who has a vision for using/selling the treadle water pumps. He immediately recognized their potential value when I talked about using them to water tree seedlings which could be sold as a cash crop. He got excited and took me outside to see several small black plastic bags filled with compost and small fruit tree seedlings that he has started to be able to take with him to the villages where he is teaching people to use drip irrigation kits and composting. While the campus has a well, electric pump and a storage tank that keeps them from needing to use these pumps personally, he realizes that these will be very valuable to the villages that have nearby water sources, but would have to haul water to raise such seedlings. Some people in the villages are already raising seedlings, but he knows they could be so much more successful with a pump.

I came to assist a long-time friend, assess how I might partner with them in Access Ministry development and to see if teaching/training the students in CPM might work. Obviously it is too early to really know how fruitful this will be, but I am recommending that round-table team to stay prayerfully open to one member’s suggestion. We all need to investigate whether or not we could nurture a working relationship with the schools where we attended Bible College and/or seminary. Maybe we start by developing a curriculum that could be used in a two to three-week intensive missions course. There is certainly some excellent material in the Perspectives course that could be utilized. The fourth edition Perspectives Reader would be an excellent resource.

There is also some excellent systematic theology material that one of my friends has available online that could be very useful because of how focused it is on the Bible being first and foremost about God. You can access and read through that material at http://johnmarkhicks.wordpress.com/serial-index/. Using it will require some adaptation, but provides a great overview of God’s self-revelation in Scriptures. John Mark Hicks, the author, listened to the CPM training CDs from Sierra Leone in 2006 and finds the approach of having people learn a simple study method very desirable. He loves the fact that the first question we train people to ask of a text is, “What do we learn about God from this passage/story?” We may need to start tuning our sensors to identify “Persons of Peace” within Bible Colleges, Universities and Seminaries.

I am excited thinking of what God may bring out of our discussions. The timing of me receiving the compilation certainly caught my attention. Being part of a multi-national team keeps life interesting. Join me in praying that God will use us to fulfill his purpose of people from every tribe, language and people group gathered around his throne worshiping him in adoration (Revelation 7).

Being Like the Master

Your sense of identity shapes your choice of activities. If you are a carpenter then you build things. If you are a librarian then you purchase, catalog, and arrange books. If you are a child of the king then you…? If you are a disciple of Jesus you…?

In the Scriptures we find that God changes the people he calls by giving them a new identity, challenging them to live up to that sense of self-definition and empowering their new walk. Because our relationship with Jesus makes us “holy” we are called to live holy lives. Here we see the connection between indicatives and imperatives in Paul’s writings. In the first half of most of his letters he discusses the identity of people “in Christ.” The second half shows how that new identity in Christ changes the way we are to behave and determines to a great extent what we do.

If you begin to see yourself as a church planter that self-definition will change what you do in significant ways. You will begin to pray for wisdom to discern which communities need churches. There will be care to identify the obstacles to planting churches there. Care will be given to discover the profile of the ideal person to transmit the gospel in that community. “Who has access to the majority of that community?” is the kind of question that will capture your attention.

Two large draft horses placed first and second at a horse pull. The second place horse pulled a sled weighing 400 pounds. The winner pulled 450 pounds. When someone suggested the two be harnessed together they were able to pull 1,200 pounds as a team. Church planters realize the task is too great to be accomplished alone. They recognize their work will require a team. Their thoughts swing to recognizing who else needs to be involved. Concern is given to who needs additional training and what kind of training is essential.

How different would our lives be if we saw ourselves as church planting missionaries? Did you know there are five different great commissions? Jesus wants all his disciples to recognize that following him means we begin to search for the people God wants matured into new church plants. Jesus said his disciples would be like their master. Are you like him?

Two Remarkable Conversations

One was a young Jewish lady who is training to become a nurse. She said, “Africa is calling my name.” The other was a mother of a six-year old daughter who told me, with tears in her eyes, “No, I cannot picture myself in God’s lap hearing him say, ‘I am proud of you!'”

I traveled to Dallas two days ago to hear news of great things God is doing in Asia. While there I led a devotional for the group. We looked at Ephesians 1:15-23 and Ephesians 3:14-21. Both texts model great intercession and discuss the fact that being on mission with God requires divine power. Paul prayed that the churches planted through the Multiplying Ministry he launched from Ephesus, throughout Asia, would experience God’s “incomparably great power for us who believe” (1:19).

Paul also prayed they would grasp the vastness of Christ’s love so they would “be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God” (3:19). Imagine that! Jesus’s love can produce the fullness of God in us. Then, Paul states a mind-blowing promise–God is “able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to his power that is at work within us” (3:20). I am claiming that promise!

Claiming his promise brings me back to those two ladies I mentioned earlier. The first one was in her twenties and had a bubbly personality. She quickly said, “This is only my second flight! Are you a frequent flyer?” I briefly mentioned some of my international flights. She really perked up when I mentioned Africa. “Africa has my name!” she said excitedly. After finding out she was in nursing school, I told her she could do much good in Africa.

Eventually the conversation died down and she pulled out her book. I got out my Kindle and returned to Neil Cole’s book, Church 3.0. After a while I noticed she had fallen asleep. Later she woke from her nap as drinks were being served.

When we returned to our earlier conversation I said, “My first international flight was to Israel.” She really became animated. She told me she was a practicing Jew and was excited she would be able to make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land next year. She started asking questions about my trip. I was able to describe some of the remarkably unique characteristics of the tiny strip of land we call Israel.

Before traveling there I did not realize you can stand on a high point in Jerusalem and see the borders to the north, south, east and west. I pointed out to her that this narrow land bridge connects Eur-Asia to Africa. Because of the desert to the east, all the land routes passed through this region. God had called Abraham and his people to this hallway between the largest landmasses of the world. “What an awesome way to put his people on display for the nations!” I praised him. She said, “I never thought about it like that.”

Then she turned to tell me that her parents were divorced and her mom had recently converted to Christianity. Her mom was baptized in Israel on a trip last year. Now she said that her mom wanted her to read the New Testament to be “well-rounded.”

I said, “Well, with the exception of Luke and Acts which were written by a Gentile, the rest of the New Testament is the largest block of Jewish writings from the first century.” I proceeded to tell her that the first four books tell the story of Jesus for the sake of communicating it well to four different people groups. Matthew writes for a more Jewish audience. Mark tells the story of Jesus for Romans. Of course, Luke writes for Gentiles. Then John seems to tell it for a more Eastern mind-set. She asked, “Now which one was for Jewish readers?” I told her it was Matthew, the first one and gave a few illustrations. She seemed intrigued. We were taxing into DFW airport, so our conversation ended.

On the return flight I noticed that the lady sitting next to me had on a jacket with a Belmont University logo. I said, “Oh, are you a student at Belmont?”

She said, “No, I have worked there for seventeen years!” So I asked if she was on the faculty and she said, “I am an adjunct faculty member, but I work full-time in the recreation department.”

She asked about my work and I told her that I had gone to a conference in Dallas because of my work training indigenous church planters in Africa. She seemed interested so I shared the four questions we train them to use when they facilitate Discovery Bible Studies. After she asked a question I told her that the third question about obedience is where inner transformation takes hold. When she showed and openness to hearing more I shared the S.P.E.C.K. questions that can help us discover how to obey any passage. As I got to the third “P”–“Is there a Promise here that I can claim?” I mentioned the promise in Ephesians 3:20 of God’s willingness and ability to give us more.

A question popped into my mind, right at this point. I asked it–“Can’t you just picture yourself crawling up in God’s lap to ask him for something and hearing him say, ‘You make me so proud!”?

As she fought back the tears she said, “No. I know he exists, and I know he is able, but I am not worthy of that. He is Sovereign and he can do what he wants. I don’t want to risk asking for something he does not want to give me and getting a ‘No.'”

My heart just ached. But I had solid confirmation that she is churched. Sovereign is a word you only hear from church people. It turns out she is a pastor’s wife for a church that has been shrinking from 70 to 50 since they have been working with them.

I reminded her of Jesus’ story about the Prodigal Son, pointing out that the younger boy was not worthy of Papa’s extravagant grace. While he’s practicing his “I’m unworthy” speech his dad is running to receive him back as his son.

I returned to finish the letters “E.C.K.” Then I asked, “Does that make sense? Can you think of somewhere you might do that kind of study?”

“Well, I was actually thinking about that and had begun to think maybe I could do it in a Bible study with some of the girls who work for me. We employ over 100 of our students. Up until two years ago I always did a Bible study with some of them. Maybe I can start one using this approach this fall.”

Our flight landed and we started to de-plane. Since I had an aisle seat, I stepped out and back to allow her and the lady across from my seat out. We walked through the plane, out to the concourse. She stepped aside to let the other lady go by saying, “I will wait on my co-worker.” As I passed, she said, “Thank you.”

I said, “I will pray that you find a Lady of Peace–one of those girls who works for you who will be willing to invite her friends for the study. That way you can harvest grapes and bananas, rather than apples and oranges.”

Wow, I have never had one conversation like those, let alone two. Isn’t it just like “The Impossibility Specialist” to give me these two interactions? I praise Papa for the Holy Spirit leading me through these conversations! I do pray the first lady reads Matthew and finds her heart burning in her. I pray the second one finds a Person of Peace and experiences the joy of God’s pleasure as she uses this awesome group harvesting strategy!

I am a Professor of Record

Last week something special happened. It was the fulfillment of a dream from more than thirty years ago. I made the right choice twenty years ago when I chose to release the dream at that time.

You see, when I attended Bible college the greatest influences on me were professors, not preachers. Yes, I ended up being a preaching minister, but my dream in college was to become a professor. I actually only knew one man who was a full-time preaching minister while I was in college. The peopel who influenced me most were college professors. It’s no wonder I graduated with a dream of being a professor.

My early plans were to pay off my student loans and move to Memphis to attend Harding Graduate School of Religion and earn a Masters degree. But that was 1980 and high inflation was causing a recession that made finding employment very difficult. After applying at several businesses I heard about an opening at a rural congregation where I had preached some during my junior year in college.

While evaluating whether or not to accept the work when it was offered I remembered a statement from one of my professors. He said, “Boys if you have to choose between two works, go where you believe you can do the most good. I accepted the position. Little did I know that while working there for almost five years I would meet and marry my wife and earn a Masters degree. Sometimes God blesses your dreams through avenues you would never imagine.

As we moved to Maryland in 1985 it appeared my dream of becoming a professor was drawing closer. I would work with a congregation in Maryland and try to get admitted to a PhD. program in Philadelphia. Two things arose that altered this plan. First, our son was born and second I discovered I needed additional hours to be accepted to doctoral studies. I started working on some classes and realized that the rigors of education where challenging while serving a congregation and caring for my growing family. I decided either my family or my ministry would suffer if I enrolled in the program I had planned on taking.

For the next fifteen years I poured myself into being a dad who was invovled in the lives of my children. Home, church, school and sports were places where we spent time interacting. I was present for most of their events because I chose to forgo the additional schooling.

Six years ago, God started me on a remarkable journey. Late in 2003 my wife and I attended a fund-raising dinner. I never would have dreamed that this would be a way God would alter my course. I met three people that night who have become very significant friends–Jerry Trousdale, David Watson and Terry Neu. I will tell you more about Jerry and David in later installments, but this blog has more to do with Terry.

Terry Neu is a regional coordinator for Perspectives on the World Christian Movement classes here in our part of the country. Jerry taught some classes that Terry organized and took me with him to two of them and I enjoyed the stimulating discussions. I bought a reader and workbook at the first one and started working through the material. It was a godsend because I knew a young man in jail who wanted to take a college level course while incarcerated. While he did not earn credit, he was able to work through that material after I purchased a set for him.

Eventually Terry encouraged me to serve as the host of a Perspectives class here in Murfreesboro. I audited the course and also taught lesson four. Every semester since then I have taught at least one of the classes. Now I have a new title through Perspectives. I am a Professor of Record for the Perspectives classes that are taking place this spring.

Who would have thought I would serve as a professor of a missions mobilization class? God has fulfilled another dream related to me and education. I am enjoying the ride. Next month I will be teaching a two-week class at a Bible college in Zambia. Wow! It is amazing where God has taken me.

Dream big dreams! If you will give them to God, he will fulfill them in ways you could never imagine. One of the great results is he gets the glory.

Conspicuously Spiritual, but…

Last week I posted something old and something new. First, I posted an article I wrote in 2006 that described what happened when I first taught a group of church planters in Sierra Leone to do 3-column studies. I had seen a reference to such an approach in a file on my mentor’s web site. No one had ever shown me how to do one. It just sounded like a format that could be easily implemented. (Of course I promptly complicated the process by envisioning ways to make it easier to get people to do a 3-column study, but God corrected my error.)

Then I wrote about God’s directives for any new king. That passage from Deuteronomy caught my attention because I have recently been training Americans to do 3-column studies. It gives me a text that directs leaders to write out Scriptures and then spend time every day meditating on the implications for their realm of influence.

Let’s spend some time evaluating the purpose of each of the three columns. The first column slows me down and causes me to hear the words. I must do this or I will be unable to complete the second column. Even when I used to cut and paste the text into the first column, I always had to re-read the passage numerous times to understand how to state its meaning in my own words. Writing the passage out has me handling the text. It gives me a measurable activity that indicates I have spent time with this word from God.

The second column provides proof that I have used my powers of observation. I can answer the journalists questions (Who? What? When? Where? Why? and How?). By restating the passage I verify to myself that I can help someone else hear its meaning. There are many passages that I find this to be harder to accomplish than I earlier imagined. Sometimes the more familiar I am with the passage the more difficult I find the second column to be. If I cannot put it in my words, then I do not understand its meaning. If I cannot restate it I cannot share it with someone else. While column 1 is for me, column 2 is for others. It prepares me to speak a word from God into the life of another person.

David Watson has shocked many believers by saying, “People don’t want your religion! They don’t! Now if you are truly spiritual, some of them will want to be around you, but they don’t want your religion. You have to be conspicuously spiritual without being obnoxiously religious.” I really wanted to argue with him when I first heard that statement. It was a blessing that I could not because I was listening to it on MP3 recordings. After I got beyond my initial response I began to think, “You know the word ‘religion’ generally has to be qualified in Scriptures.” The first text I thought of was the one in James where he says, “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world” (James 1:27). The use of “pure and faultless” warns us there is impure and fault-filled religion.

Conspicuously Spiritual

This part of David’s affirmation made perfect sense to me. This is what Jesus was talking about when he described the good deeds of disciples lived out in the open. He said that our lives should be so ministry-filled that people see what we do and give God glory. Jesus said,”You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven” (Matthew 5:14-16). Conspicuously (readily seen) spiritual (God-like in nature) is to be our hallmark.

Without being obnoxiously religious

Here is the hard part. How much and what kind of religion will others find obnoxious? Should I really give other people the right to judge my actions? How can I avoid being obnoxious in the eyes of others?

The key, in my judgment, is giving people the freedom to opt out at any point of a discussion. One of the best ways I know to do this is make a statement like, “I learned something new about God yesterday.” Anyone who hears me say this has the right to question, ignore or scorn my affirmation. If she/he is curious then there will be the question, “What did you learn about God?” By asking me this, I am being given permission to pursue the conversation a little further. If she ignores my statement, then she is not open yet. If he scorns my comment then I know he is closed to spiritual discussions with me at this time. To push the discussion with the later two will be viewed by them as obnoxiously religious because they have opted out.

With the person who queries me I will need to use care. So far, all he/she has communicated is curiosity about my affirmation. This person may just think I am crazy. He may wonder if I am hearing voices. She may be curious whether or not this is a trap. I suggest you just give a brief statement that summarizes what you studied. For example, I could say, “I learned God want me to hand write my own copy of the law.” Now the ball is in this person’s court. My response will give him/her the opportunity to decide whether or not to proceed further. As long as I do not dump a whole load of judgmental-ism our conversation can go as far as this person is willing.

What I am looking for in the conversation is permission to help this person discover God’s character for himself/herself. I know it will be best if this discovery process can happen in a context of this person’s significant relationships, but I first need to find out whether or not there is a willingness to participate in a discovery process.

By writing out column 2 I am preparing myself for that kind of dialogue. I am discovering something about God that is fresh, new and intriguing for me. My passion for this new insight is more likely to capture the favorable attention of another person, especially someone on whom God’s Spirit is already working. (Jesus describes such an individual as “a person of peace” in Luke 10:5.) I believe we need this kind of process to help us be conspicuously spiritual without being obnoxiously religious.

Column 3 prepares me to obey the passage I have written and paraphrased. It pushes me to open myself to being convicted by the Spirit of God. It reminds me what the Lord authoritatively demands of my life. It pushes me to be honest with God, myself and another human being (I will share at least one of these with my small group and expect them to ask me next week how I did being obedient). This column pushes me to stop deflecting the passage by spending my time discussing what others need to do to obey it. Column 3 tests my honesty and integrity. It gauges whether I am a wise man or a fool (Matthew 7:24-27). Am I going to show Jesus my love for him by obeying him? Am I going to play the fool by hearing him and then refusing to apply the word to my life?

Let me return to the Sierra Leone story for just a few moments. It looks likely that every village in the nation will have a church by the end of 2010, or at the latest 2011. When that happens this will be a remarkable example of saturation church planting. This is happening because thousands of people are hearing God’s word and being obedient. Using 3-column studies (among the literate) and teaching S.P.E.C.K. to everyone, especially the illiterate, they are being equipped to hear and obey Scripture. The Anglican bishop of Sierra Leone calls my friend every three days or so to tell him about his personal devotions with 3-column studies and about the exciting things happening in the Anglican church as a result of CPM. In addition to training every leader in his own fellowship, my friend has trained military chaplains who are going into the civilian communities to serve, and planting CPM-type churches among civilians. Civilians are also coming onto military bases to participate in the churches there.

Since late 2005 God has used these people and study methods to shine beacons of light into a nation that only recently came through a horrible civil war (the movie Blood Diamond was based on the war). Imagine what can happen to our lives through this process.

“Write for Himself”

Deuteronomy 17:18-20 jumped out at me yesterday! Since I have read the Bible through for each of the last 25+ years, I know I have read this passage at least 25 times. But there was a phrase I had never paid attention to before.

Yes, I know the text did not change, but my thinking has. This is sort of like when you purchase a new (at least to you) vehicle and you begin to notice how many people drive the same make, model and color. They did not all rush out the same day to purchase their automobiles. Your information sorting grid opens to allow you to notice that particular car.

Lately I have been training several different groups to use 3-column Bible studies. In February I traveled internationally to train people to do such studies. I have introduced a small group focusing on making disciples to use the study strategy. I expose guys in the local jail to do such studies. Tonight I will meet with four more to introduce them, also. With all these experiences a swirl at this time, I finally saw this “new-to-me” insight in Deuteronomy.

Through Moses, God tells the people of Israel that there will come a day when they insist on having a king to lead them. He gives directives and warnings. Such a king will be susceptible to leading the nation away from their allegiance to God. He will be at risk of trusting in his ability to fight battles, gain wealth and/or enter into pacts with the surrounding nations rather than staying true to the covenant with Yahweh. But the king is told to do something to protect his heart from being lead astray by pride, wealth, power or even his wives:

“When he takes the throne of his kingdom, he is to write for himself on a scroll a copy of this law, taken from that of the priests, who are Levites. It is to be with him, and he is to read it all the days of his life so that he may learn to revere the LORD his God and follow carefully all the words of this law and these decrees and not consider himself better than his brothers and turn from the law to the right or to the left. Then he and his descendants will reign a long time over his kingdom in Israel” (Deuteronomy 17:18-20).

Did you catch it? Probably not, unless you know me pretty well. If you have been with me in one of those trainings lately, you might have noticed it too.

Upon ascending to this position of power, “he is to write for himself on a scroll a copy of this law” (Deuteronomy 17:18). One of the things I am training people to do is to write out the Word of God in their own handwriting. I am admonishing they do this as a form of spiritual discipline. We (especially in the Western world) experience what I call “Spiritual Attention Deficit Disorder” and it is SADD! Television is rapidly eroding our capacity to be attentive. We long for interruptions and will create them if necessary.

Due to this condition we are unable to meditate on the Word of God. We will pay men well to chew it up, and spit it into our mouths so we only have to swallow it. We become enraged by those who would dare to expect us to do our own reading, our own meditating, our own study. We tell ourselves and others that we are “too busy.” The truth is we are too lazy and too distracted!

Could anyone in Israel be busier than a newly anointed King? Are you responsible for the oversight of hundreds of thousands of people? If not, please consider what God wants leaders to do—write out Scriptures, keep them with you all the time and read from them every day.

Did you notice the three fruits that will be born from such meditation? Moses says:

1. You will learn to revere the Lord.
2. You will learn to carefully obey his commandments.
3. You will avoid pride.

As I noted in my last post, which was written almost five years ago, there is a great value in writing out sections of Scriptures. When you do that and couple it with re-phrasing it in your own words, you have to read it numerous times. The task demands focus. It disciplines us to stick with a passage. Then take it to a third action—writing out the things God is calling you to do to obey this text. To help you with that process I challenge people to start all their sentences in the third column with the two words, “I will…” Here I write out what I will do to be obedient to what God is directing.

Kings and Chronicles would contain different stories if God’s will had been done by her leaders. Too many rejected God’s right to reign in their lives and lead the nation into sin.

How would you combine Deuteronomy 17:18-20 with 1 Peter 2:9? Do you remember that one? Here Peter makes that beautiful affirmation regarding our identity, “you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.”

We like the idea of being kings and queens with Jesus! We like the sound of being seated with him on his heavenly throne! I am convinced we will do a better job at what Peter is talking about when we practice what kings are supposed to do.

Training Trainers: An Attempt to Train Church Planters in Training New Disciples in Doing Their Own Inductive Bible Study

[NOTE: This is an article I wrote in early 2006 that has not been published. I am posting it here because of its relevance to my greatest passion–training people to train others in a simple process of learning God’s heart and becoming obedient to His word.]

Likely we have all heard the old adage, “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.  Teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.”  What if we raised it to a higher power?  “Teach him to train his village to fish and you feed them all for a lifetime.”

Replication is one of the fundamental principles of Church Planting Movements (CPM).  Disciples of Jesus should replicate the Master’s ministry of pouring himself into people who will in turn teach what they are learning to others who pass it on . . . Churches also should be reproducing pregnant churches.  At its fundamental center Church Planting is about understanding and practicing this call to replication from day one.  It also serves as a basic test for all methodology.  Disciples should be discipled in a manner that they can replicate (e.g., if evangelists are going to be working in village settings it is best if they are trained in methods that will be readily available in the villages).

In the spring of 2005 I was commissioned with the task of developing and implementing an approach to training people to train others in doing their own inductive Bible study.  This assignment came because there was a weakness in this critical Bible study approach in Sierra Leone.  As David Watson trained church leaders there in CPM earlier that year he identified this deficiency.  With this insight, Jerry Trousdale and Shodankeh Johnson encouraged me to return in November 2005 and train a group in doing Inductive Bible Studies.

As I sought guidance in developing a strategy for accomplishing this task I was reminded that such learning is “only internalized through practical work.” I was reminded that church planters should be lead “through a time of struggling with passages that relate to the biblical basis of CPM, both as a way of solidifying their understanding of how the inductive process works, as well as being personally sharpened in looking for a theology of CPM.”

Where Should They Begin?

 “What is my theology of CPM?” and “What passages do I encourage disciples to investigate to discover the biblical basis for CPM?” were questions that kept arising in my thinking.  The answer was the Ephesus material.

Let me point out, that as a Bible student, few practices trouble me more than “proof-texting.”  Selecting a few verses from random biblical sites and stringing them together as the proof for a position is always tenuous at best.  While it may be acceptable when under severe time constraints, this methodology is very susceptible to abuse.  I much prefer finding a block of connected material and carefully studying it rather than skipping around.

Few cities rival the prominent position of Ephesus in the New Testament.  Jerusalem, Antioch of Syria, Corinth and Rome are possible candidates.  But when you consider them in light of CPM, Ephesus has more to offer.  Paul desired to work in the Roman province of Asia during the early stages of the second missionary journey, but the Holy Spirit prevented that from happening (Acts 16:6).  God’s Spirit had already prepared persons of peace (Lydia, the jailor, Dionysius, Damaris, Titius Justis, etc.) in Macedonia and Achaia and the apostle and his church planting team heeded divine directions.  But Paul was able to close his second church-planting trip with a short stay in the capitol of Asia and left with a promise, “I will come back if it is God’s will” (Acts 18:21).

Acts 19 tells the wonderful story of the successful launching of a church planting movement.  An opponent testifies to the impact of Paul’s ministry.  A silversmith named Demetrius was angered that the apostle’s work adversely impacted the “bottom line” of his business.  He pointed out to the other silversmiths, “you see and hear how this fellow Paul has convinced and led astray large numbers of people here in Ephesus and in practically the whole province of Asia” (Acts 19:26).  We know that churches were planted in nearby Laodicea and Colossae during the time Paul was in Ephesus.

The three years Paul labored in Ephesus was his longest time spent with any of his church plants.  Many believe he rarely stayed longer than six to nine months in the cities where he planted churches.  I believe the reason he stayed unusually long in Ephesus was he essentially established a church planting training center in the “lecture hall of Tyrannus” (Acts 19:9).

When you examine Ephesians, Colossians, Philemon, and 1 Timothy through this Acts material some interesting insights arise. (It is also interesting to note that John’s Gospel, his letters and Revelation may well have arisen in this context of Asia,too.)  In Ephesus Paul modeled Jesus’ teaching about seeking out persons of peace (Luke 10).  He quickly focused on training local leaders so indigenous churches would develop.  Much can be learned about doing church planting well by investigating the Ephesus material.

How Do You Train in Three Days?

 How do you train people to do their own inductive Bible study, introduce them to the Ephesus material and guide them in the process of discovering their own nascent theology of CPM in three days?  That was my dilemma.

After prayer and through dialogue with colleagues I decided to introduce the church planters to inductive study by giving them the one-page chart that had been developed by David Sargeant.  This Inductive Bible Study Approach—Outline is a succinct tool that encourages Bible students to answer basic journalistic questions:  who, what, where, when, why and how.  It calls them to think about the text in a way that equips them to re-tell it in their own words—basic exegesis.  Then it pushes them to think about how the passage should be applied to their own lives.  Through the S.P.E.C.K. method and additional discussion questions the students are led to determine how they will obey the text they are studying.

The first day in Sierra Leone I passed out copies of this outline and introduced the students to the issues it raises.  After some time was spent on this approach I divided them into six randomly assigned small groups.  Each person was given a 3-Column format to use in reporting the results of their inductive study.  Unknown to them, each group was assigned a different section of the Ephesus material.

Acts19:1-22, Acts 19:23-20:1, Acts 20:13-38, Ephesians 1:1-23; Ephesians 3:1-4:16 and Ephesians 6:10-24 were the texts I selected, formatted and gave out copies.  Each small group was encouraged to spend time discussing the questions raised on the Inductive Bible Study Approach.  Also, they were taught that the first two sections of that outline would be helpful in completing the “Exegesis” column and the rest of the sections would be helpful in completing the “Application” column.  After spending time as a group examining their texts they were dismissed to use the rest of the day to complete in writing their 3-column study of their assigned text.

On the second day a representative of each group presented his/her rephrasing of the assigned text.  After all six passages were retold, then a different representative of each group shared what he/she heard God calling for obedience from the assigned text. 

Quickly the students realized their assumption that all the groups had been studying the same texts was incorrect.  But they also began to recognize that the other passages related directly to their text.  By teaching what they had encountered, each group broadened the knowledge of the other five groups.  Then the students turned in their 3-column papers.  This process took the first half of the second day.  That afternoon we began the process of distilling principles related to Church Planting that appeared in the texts:

  1. The importance of prayer was recognized first.  Paul’s practice of praying for those he was discipling was clearly seen in the Ephesians texts.  His conduct while in Ephesus and Miletus shows the importance of prayer in his church planting strategy.
  2. The role of obedience was mentioned second.  This is especially evident in Paul’s dialogue with the Ephesian elders in Acts 20 and it is also seen in the choice of Ephesian believers to destroy their magical stuff (Acts 19:18-19).  We noted that Paul’s desire that they know Jesus would have entailed behavior and not just head knowledge.
  3. The issue of spiritual warfare being a part of church planting was noted.  The riot in Ephesus and Paul’s words to the elders about them not seeing him again, were coupled with the “spiritual armor” text in Ephesians.  There was the recognition that some will find the spread of the gospel has an adverse effect on their income and will oppose the work.  It was noted by some of the participants the importance of remembering that the war is not with “flesh and blood, but with principalities and powers” (Eph. 6:12).
  4. The need to develop indigenous leaders was discussed.  This insight was gained from Paul’s dialogue with the elders.  It was also noted that Paul’s conduct in Ephesus, during the time he taught the disciples in a rented school, shows him pouring himself into others.  I also pointed out that Colossians and Philemon are additional letters Paul wrote to believers who lived in the province of Asia and would be worthwhile for them to study in this context.
  5. The fundamental significance of having a servant heart was examined last.  Paul’s lifestyle was held up as an example for the elders to incorporate into their lives.  His practice of tent making was discussed as a way of looking at using a trade as a means of furthering the spread of the gospel.  Some of the participants shared that there are times when such will be beneficial rather than a hindrance to their efforts to plant churches.

Church Planters recognize these are important elements of CPMs.  These students discovered these within their investigation of the assigned texts.  Their sense of the biblical basis for CPM is stronger because these elements arose from connected texts.  Through the discovery process their inductive skills were sharpened as they exercised them.  While my original goals seemed overly high, I believe they were realized.  Did any of the students develop a full-blown theology of CPM?  No, that did not happen, but students of very diverse skill levels were benefited.

Those who had stronger study skills were kept interested because of the purpose of strengthening their theology of CPM.  All were presented with a study methodology that can be replicated.  Their homework for the third day took this issue of replication to a new level.  Every student was assigned 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and 4:11-16 to be studied overnight and bring in a 3-column format.  This time they were not given these texts already typed out.  They were told to write the texts in the first column and then do their exegesis in column 2 and the application in column 3.

The third day they were directed to turn in their homework on these texts.  They were asked to report on the texts.  Several complained that it was much easier to do the work when the texts were provided in the 3-column format.  I asked, “How many of you work primarily in a village setting.  Most said that is where they would be doing their church planting.  Then I asked, “How many of the villages have photocopy machines?” 

“None of the villages,” was their answer.

“How many of you have computers and internet access to format such studies?” was my follow-up question.  Very few had such capability.  I introduced the issue of reproducibility at this point.  While I have the ability to expedite their study in this way, they do not and the people they will be training to teach others in the village how to study will not have such a capacity at all.  They were challenged to make sure they utelize resources to which the people they are teaching will have access.

We can (and often do) unintentionally make the process unattainable for our target audience.  When this happens we program them to not replicate themselves.  Their study in 1 Timothy which focused on the personal qualities of pastors and evangelists gave them additional insights into planting churches in such a way that they can plant churches which plant churches.  We must not allow technology to get in the way and prevent indigenous churches from arising.